![]() ![]() Considered as “the holy grail of computing,” 1 the XML language endeavored “to solve the problem of universal data interchange between dissimilar systems” (Dr. XML was an evolution from SGML-designed to provide a means to define, and to enforce, structured content. In the late 1990s, a group of people-including Jon Bosak, Tim Bray, James Clark and others-came up with XML: the “eXtensible Markup Language.” Like SGML, XML is not itself a markup language, but a specification for the definition of markup languages. This divergence catastrophe became a huge problem for web applications as developers struggled to write interoperable code for the browsers. The fierce competition resulted in a “divergence catastrophe” as the augmentation of HTML by the two companies caused the browsers to support their own unique versions of HTML. The contest for the most popular web browser between Netscape and Microsoft yielded rapid progress, but it also led to relentless fragmentation of the standard. As a derivative of SGML, HTML lacked a strict specification to restrain companies from freely expanding it to fulfill requirements that were beyond the original concept. In addition to mass adoption, HTML saw mass adaptation-extensions were embedded to support multimedia, animation, online applications, eCommerce, and more. ![]() HTML came from SGML, or “Standard Generalized Markup Language,” invented in the 1970s by IBM. HTML was introduced in 1991 and was widely adopted by universities, businesses, and government organizations as the language of the web. To uncover the reason for JSON’s popularity over XML, let’s explore the history of the web and how its evolution from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0 influenced trends in development. Consider the evolution of software trends in recent years to ascertain why JSON became more popular than XML.Take a closer look at the history of the web to uncover the original purpose of XML and JSON.XML” might go to JSON on the surface, but at depth, there is more than meets the eye. At first blush, JSON seems to be most popular-so is JSON simply better than XML? The battle of “JSON vs. Numerous articles insist that JSON is superior to XML due to its terse semantics and discount XML as an inefficient and confusing standard of the past. XML” will bring countless articles and blog posts comparing the two standards, and amounting to a progressively expanding bias praising JSON’s simplicity and criticizing XML’s verbosity. Today, JSON is the most widely-used format, but it only overtook XML within the last five years. XML, Part 2: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Bothįrom desktop to web and mobile, nearly all computer applications that we use today rely on one of two principal message standards: JSON and XML.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |